🔗 Share this article

The real-life crime genre has an innovative format, or perhaps even a whole new language and structure: officer-worn camera recordings. Countenances of those harmed, observers and possible perpetrators loom up to the cameras, sometimes in the harsh glare of headlights or torches as the police arrive, their faces and voices eloquent of wariness or panic or anger or suspiciously contrived innocence. And we frequently incidentally glimpse the faces of the law enforcement personnel, one waiting impassively while the other conducts the inquiry with what occasionally seems like extraordinary diffidence – though perhaps this is because they know they are being recorded.

An Emerging Pattern in Non-Fiction Cinema

We have previously seen the Netflix true-crime documentary The Gabby Petito Case, about the killing of an Instagram influencer by her partner, whose primary focus was body cam footage and in which, as in this film, the law enforcement seemed extraordinarily lax with the perpetrator. There is also Bill Morrison’s Oscar-nominated short Incident, made exclusively of body cam film. Now comes Geeta Gandbhir’s documentary about the tragic incident of a Florida mother in Ocala, Florida, a woman of colour whose four young kids reportedly bothered and antagonized her white neighbour, Susan Lorincz. In 2023, after an increasing number of neighborhood conflicts in which the police were summoned multiple times, Lorincz fatally shot Owens through her closed front door, when Owens went to the neighbor's residence to confront her about hurling items at her children.

The Police Inquiry and Legal Context

The investigating authorities found proof that Lorincz had done internet searches into the state's self-defense statutes, which permit residents and others to use firearms if there is a reasonable belief of threat. The movie constructs its narrative with the officer recordings generated during the multiple officer calls to the location before the shooting, and then at the horrific and chaotic incident site itself – prefaced by 911 audio material of the caller calling the police in a melodramatically shaky voice. There is also police cell footage of Lorincz which has a disturbing, unsettling appeal.

Portrayal of the Accused

The film does not really imply anything too complicated about Lorincz, or any extenuating circumstance. She is obviously disturbed, although the kids are heard calling her “the Karen”, an ugly jibe. The film is presented as an example of how “stand your ground” laws generate unnecessary and heartbreaking violence. But the reality of gun ownership and the constitutional right (that longstanding U.S. legal right that a late commentator famously claimed made firearm fatalities a necessary cost) is not much emphasized.

Officer Questioning and Firearm Norms

It is possible to watch the officer questioning segments here and feel surprised at how little interest the police took in this point. At what time did she purchase the firearm? Did she receive any instruction on handling it? Had she ever had occasion to fire it before? How was the gun kept in her home? Could it have been easily accessible and prepared? The police aren’t shown asking any of these surely relevant questions (though they could have inquired in recordings that were not included). Or is possessing a firearm so commonplace it would be like asking about kitchen appliances or bread heaters?

Arrest and Aftermath

For what appeared to her neighbors a very long time, Lorincz was not even arrested and charged, only held and even provided accommodation away from home for the night (another point of comparison, by the way, with the a prior incident). And when she was finally officially taken into custody in the detention area, there is an remarkable scene in which the individual simply declines to rise, refuses to put her wrists out for the cuffs, not aggressively, but with the courteously pathetic demeanor of someone whose mental health means that she is unable to comply. Did the gentle handling up until that point led her to think that this could be effective?

Conclusion and Verdict

It was not successful; and the panel's decision is revealed in the end titles. A deeply sobering picture of American crime and punishment.